Trang chủ Housewives Live Cam Motivations and Experiences Regarding Ladies’ Very Very First Same-sex Sexual Encounters

Motivations and Experiences Regarding Ladies’ Very Very First Same-sex Sexual Encounters

Motivations and Experiences Regarding Ladies’ Very Very First Same-sex Sexual Encounters

Amelia E. Talley

Texas Tech University

Mackenzie A. Cook

Catherine A. Schroy

Texas Ladies’ University


Utilizing ladies’ self-identified intimate identification, the present research compares motivations for very first same-sex intimate encounters also connected experiential results. We additionally examine whether relations between sexual motivations and outcomes that are experiential being a function of females’s intimate identification status. Individuals had been females (N=123), many years 18-to-29 (M=21.59, SD=3.33), who self-reported a brief history of same-sex intimate contact. Around 27% of females recognized as solely heterosexual (i.e., EH), 35% as mainly heterosexual (for example., ‘mostly heterosexual’ MH), and 38% as solely or primarily lesbian/ gay, or bisexual (i.e., LGB). Individuals finished a paid survey. MH and LGB females reported very very first same-sex sexual encounters which were more inspired by closeness and research motives, in accordance with EH womenpared to MH and LGB females, EH additionally involved in less intimate tasks due to their very very very very first partner that is same-sex. Intimacy and exploration motives had been pertaining to good experiential results during very first same-sex contact. Associations between motivations and outcomes that are experiential maybe not moderated by intimate identification. Findings subscribe sexy housewife to understanding motivations and experiences pertaining to ladies’ very first same-sex intimate encounters and show that not totally all females with a brief history of same-sex intimate contact afterwards determine with a minority intimate identification label.

Humans take part in sex for a number of reasons and, very important to the motivational way of understanding intimate behavior, these motivating factors are thought to contour subsequent experiences and expressions of sex (Cooper, Barber, Zhaoyang, & Talley, 2011). The particular reasons encouraging sexual intercourse, including same-sex task, can mirror a person’s wider approach or avoidance orientations ( e.g., Birnbaum et al., 2014), that are theorized become associated with distinct neurological and behavioral systems (Birnbaum et al., 2014; Gray, 1970, 1987). For instance, present findings suggest that underlying excitatory/inhibitory motivational systems affect the motivation value related to various behavior that is risk-takingBirnbaum et al., 2014; Nagoski et al., 2012) and sexual stimuli (Birnbaum et al. 2014; Ferrey et al., 2012) that can have broad effect on psychosocial and intimate functioning (Birnbaum et al. 2014; Impett et al., 2008).

The significance of understanding motivational facets for starting same-sex activity that is sexual self-evident. This knowledge has got the possible to share with basic research examining facets that motivate adolescents’ and teenagers’ research of numerous intimate destinations and impulses and fundamentally notify a particular sexual identity to their self-identification (for example., intimate identification development; Rosario, Schrimshaw, & Hunter, 2006). The present work additionally has relevance for used researchers who look for to produce interventions that restrict negative effects ( e.g., intimately transmitted infections) for people with distinct underlying motivations for intercourse which might potentiate risk-taking during initial and subsequent intimate encounters ( ag e.g., sex intoxicated by medications or liquor).

Although initial intimate encounters might have lasting effect on subsequent sexual intercourse and development ( e.g., Epstein, Bailey, Manhart, Hill, & Hawkins, 2014), a systematic contrast of teenagers’ subjective connection with and motivations with regards to their initial sexual encounters predicated on their self-identified intimate identification, no matter their partner’s biological intercourse, has yet to be carried out. Ones own intimate identification is informed by different facets of their sex, including their self-labeling ( e.g., heterosexual, bisexual) in addition to their attraction toward and engagement in sex with lovers of varying sex identities (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, & Michaels, 1994; Morgan, 2013). Findings from qualitative interviews with “self-identified intimate minorities” (Galupo, Davis, Grynkiewiez, & Mitchell, 2014) claim that self-labeling of your respective intimate identification is of main value in considering and determining a person’s intimate orientation. Individuals’ present, self-ascribed intimate identification ended up being regarded as “primary over present and previous experience that may otherwise be interpreted as ‘contradictory’” (p. 16).