Trang chủ blog The necessary approval at a second general meeting on Wednesday in Utrecht, the Netherlands, is also likely, since the same shareholders are allowed to vote there.

The necessary approval at a second general meeting on Wednesday in Utrecht, the Netherlands, is also likely, since the same shareholders are allowed to vote there.

The necessary approval at a second general meeting on Wednesday in Utrecht, the Netherlands, is also likely, since the same shareholders are allowed to vote there.

Little Yagmur, who bled to death in Hamburg in December after a liver tear from being beaten by her father, has been accompanied by the youth welfare office since she was born. After assessing an earlier injury, the Hamburg coroner Klaus Püschel warned that the mother and father’s child was in acute danger. But Yagmur came back to her birth parents. She died shortly afterwards, and in this case the signs of abuse hadn’t even been misinterpreted, for some reason they just didn’t want to take Yagmur out of the family.

One reason could have been money, because the care of the parents by a private agency costs only a fraction of what is due for a foster family. The doctors cite the financial dependency of the helpers on state institutions as a real obstacle to effective child protection, but there are others as well. Tsokos and Guddat report on school principals who forbid a teacher from attempting to report the injuries of one of their students to the police. And forensic doctors keep seeing judges, lawyers and youth welfare officers who refuse to look at photos like the ones described above. If it were up to the two doctors, families at risk would be monitored more frequently and better, and children at risk would be placed in homes or with foster families more quickly.

People who work with children would be trained to recognize injuries from abuse. Every child who died in Germany would be subjected to an investigation and family judges would withdraw custody from more parents with the help of forensic medical reports. He can no longer stand it, says Tsokos, when a dead child is lying on his section table and the responsible authorities only get the information that nothing has been done wrong. “Germany is mistreating its children” order from Amazon Source: “Der The Yagmur case also concerns the parliamentary committee of inquiry of the citizenship. (Photo: dpa) Yagmur’s father is known to the police for assault, theft and drug offenses. When the three-year-old dies, the suspicion is directed primarily against him.

But now the case takes a surprising turn: In the Yagmur case, the public prosecutor’s office has now brought murder charges against the mother. The father is only accused of bodily harm resulting in death by failure. “The suspicion was reversed,” said the prosecutor’s spokeswoman, Nana Frombach. The 27-year-old mother denies the act. The father claims nothing of the abuse.

Both are in custody. The three-year-old died on December 18 of a ruptured liver. The autopsy showed that she had internally bled to death in her parents’ apartment in Hamburg-Billstedt.

Originally the father was accused of manslaughter.custom biology essay writing service He is known to the police for assault, theft and drug offenses. The arrest warrant for the mother was for bodily harm resulting in death by failure. But at the end of the investigation, the prosecution saw the mother’s murder criterion of cruelty. Not the father, but she is said to have hit the girl again and again. In her statements, the 27-year-old had repeatedly incriminated her husband.

She wanted to split up, but her 25-year-old husband took revenge on their daughter. Investigations have now revealed that the father was on his way to work when the little girl was fatally injured. Yagmur has been looked after by several youth welfare offices since she was born. However, the responsible employees overlooked or misinterpreted earlier indications of abuse. A parliamentary committee of inquiry of the citizenship wants to uncover the mistakes of the authorities. Source:, sba / dpa “A heart at the grave of Yagmur. (Photo: dpa) In the process of the violent death of the three-year-old Yagmur the verdict against the accused will be announced today Parents expected: the mother of the child, who has been tortured to death, is sentenced to life in prison for murder according to the will of the public prosecutor.

But in this case, hardly anyone is guilty. Yagmur was only three years, two months and nine days old. The little girl from Hamburg-Billstedt died in December last year in her parents’ apartment. Tormented to death – probably by his own mother.

27-year-old Melek Y. is being tried for murder. “Out of hatred of your daughter,” is the prosecution’s charge. The father, Hüseyin Y., is said to have watched the abuse and the girl’s case caused great horror nationwide. Not only because of the gruesome death, but also because it reveals the incredible failure of the authorities. Now the Hamburg jury will pass the verdict against the parents.

They stood trial for a little over five months, and the trial revealed gruesome details of the ordeal Yagmur must have endured. The pictures of Yagmur’s corpse that were shown in the courtroom are particularly shocking. No matter whether on the head, neck, chest, back, arms or legs, the photos are the same. Scars, scratches, hematomas of all colors: fresh reddish-purple, older, brown and yellow – Yagmur’s early death could have been prevented. The foster mother, with whom the girl had been housed again and again since the first few months of life, had reported several injuries to the responsible youth welfare office.

In January 2013, Yagmur was hospitalized with a traumatic brain injury and a ruptured pancreas. The doctors have to operate in an emergency. According to the parents’ statement, she should have slipped in the bathtub. In the hospital, however, child abuse is quickly suspected. A doctor files a complaint.

But then everything goes wrong and a judge has to decide whether Yagmur can ever go back to her parents. Three people are possible for the abuse: the father, the mother or the foster mother. But instead of asking when the injuries occurred and who was responsible for Yagmur during that time, nothing happens.

Neither the judge nor the youth welfare office or the public prosecutor’s office try to find answers or at least talk to each other. Yagmur is temporarily placed in a children’s home. At the beginning of May, Yagmur’s foster mother wrote an email to the youth welfare office, in which she described that she had shaken Yagmur once in the car seat. The youth welfare office now believes that the foster mother is to blame for the injuries. The youth welfare office employees see this as a relief for Melek and Hüseyin Y. A clear misjudgment. In fact, the judge never read the foster mother’s e-mail, never received it from the youth welfare office, and never asked again.

Nor does she check whether the foster mother’s descriptions match the child’s terrible injuries. Instead, she allows her parents to deal with Yagmur again. Two months before Yagmur’s death, the forensic doctors come to the conclusion that shaking the car seat could not have caused the serious injuries. The foster mother falls out again as the perpetrator. So it is in the report, which only goes to the public prosecutor and weeks later to the youth welfare office.

The parents are again suspected as perpetrators, but no one reacts. Yagmur stays with his parents. The public prosecutor’s office stops its investigations, the new inexperienced employee in the youth welfare office does not read the files and the new findings do not even reach the judge. Yagmur dies on Jan.

December. Her small body is littered with bruises, scars, and scratches. The doctors count 83 external injuries, and her brain and almost all of her organs were injured. In the end, the three-year-old “simply collapsed”. Source: “Yagmur’s father is said to have watched while his wife tortured the girl to death. (Photo: picture alliance / dpa) Yagmur’s father followed the process without any visible emotion the death of his daughter – after all, he too should be complicit.

When the judge showed a video of the girl, however, he was overwhelmed by emotions. In the trial of the violent death of the girl Yagmur from Hamburg, the co-accused father raised serious allegations against his wife. In response to a video showing the girl playing, he threw a small chain at his wife and shouted in Turkish: “You killed her, why are you crying?” At the beginning of the trial a few weeks ago, both father and mother had exercised their right to remain silent. The 27-year-old defendant did not look at the pictures of her dead daughter; the mother hid her face behind her hands most of the time. The father watched the videos of the happily dancing girl petrified until it exploded. The presiding judge temporarily suspended the hearing.

After that, the father remained silent and let the hearing go by with his head drooping. During the day of the trial, the chamber heard a forensic doctor as a witness who had examined the girl’s bruised body. The expert reported how she was called into the apartment, where an emergency doctor had tried in vain to resuscitate the child. Yagmur also had bruises on parts of the body that could not be explained by falling.

In addition, some of the injuries were covered with make-up. The girl died of internal bleeding caused by blunt violence such as hand blows, and prosecutors accused the mother of murdering her daughter out of hatred. The father is said to have watched while his wife repeatedly abused the three-year-old. Yagmur had collapsed at her parents’ home on December 18, 2013, and she died of internal bleeding as a result of a ruptured liver.

Yagmur had only been living with her birth parents for a few months. Before that, she was housed with a foster mother and in a child protection house. Source:, jog / dpa “After a second billion dollar rescue operation for the Belgian-Dutch financial group Fortis within a week, the governments in Brussels, The Hague and Luxembourg are hoping for a stabilization “The Belgian government will not leave any saver out in the rain,” said Belgian Prime Minister Yves Leterme on the night of Saturday on Belgian television. The government in The Hague paid EUR 16.8 billion on Friday to raise the Dutch bank and insurance activities from Fortis including the stake in the bank ABN Amro. Together with Belgium and Luxembourg, the Netherlands had already raised 11.2 billion euros a week earlier to each acquire 49 percent of Fortis’ capital in their countries . “We had to act again,” affirmed the Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter B alkenende.

The rescue operation from the previous weekend was “not quite enough”. Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker spoke, according to the “Luxemburger Wort”, of a “structural consolidation of what the governments decided last weekend”. The first funds “evaporated” within a few days. “We are convinced that the measures taken will ensure the necessary stability at Fortis, “wrote the head of the company, Filip Dierckx, to the approximately 50,000 employees of the bank. The purchase price paid by the Dutch government is intended to ensure the liquidity of the Fortis Group’s bank. At the same time, by taking over the entire capital of the Dutch Fortis bank, the Dutch state is preventing uncertainty about the future of the ABN Amro bank.

It was only in 2007 that Fortis took over the Dutch ABN Amro for 24 billion. During the first rescue operation it was decided that ABN Amro should be sold again. The Dutch finance minister Wouter Bos said the government wanted to privatize Fortis Netherlands again as soon as the market was suitable. The 11.2 billion euros made available in the first bailout had “evaporated” within a few days, wrote the Belgian newspaper “De Standaard” on Saturday. Above all, numerous major Dutch customers had withdrawn their money despite the 49 percent takeover by the three governments. This made a second aid package necessary. Sale or nationalization Belgian newspapers speculated about the future of the Belgian-Luxembourg part of Fortis.

The government in Brussels is ready to completely nationalize the bank if necessary, wrote the business papers “Tijd” and “L’cho”. Luxembourg Budget Minister Luc Frieden said that Brussels and Luxembourg wanted to announce further parts of a “step-by-step plan” in the coming days, the aim of which was to “further consolidate the structure and activities of society”. The Belgian media said it was conceivable also that Belgium is increasing its stake in Fortis Belgium above the 49 percent previously held. However, a purchase of Fortis, for example by the French banks BNP Paribas or Socit Gnrale, cannot be ruled out. “Everything depends on the price.

And if there is no agreement, then complete nationalization is not ruled out “, wrote the newspaper” La Libre Belgique “on Saturday. Source:” The shareholders of the Belgian-Dutch financial group Fortis have sold part of the troubled institute to the major French bank BNP Paribas at the first of two general meetings. At a meeting in Ghent, Belgium on Tuesday, 73 percent of shareholders voted in favor of the sale. The necessary approval at a second general meeting on Wednesday in Utrecht, the Netherlands, is also likely, since the same shareholders are allowed to vote there. The sale would be perfect on the third attempt. Before the vote, there was a scandal in Ghent when angry shareholders pelted board chair Jozef de Mey with shoes and coins in protest against the partial sale and loudly demanded his resignation from BNP Paribas recently to withdraw the takeover offer if shareholders reject the purchase. Belgium and the largest French bank had agreed on new terms for breaking up Fortis at the beginning of March.

With the purchase of shares, BNP would become the largest bank in the euro zone in terms of deposits. BNP Paribas wants to take over 75 percent of Fortis Bank. The former banking division of the listed Fortis Holding is now owned by the Belgian state. In February, Fortis shareholders voted with a wafer-thin majority against the Belgian state’s plans to split up the financial group, thus calling into question the expansion plans of BNP Paribas.